Messages

1

Off-Topic Discussion / Re: ir0ck

« on: 22 May 2018, 11:19:31 AM »

Yes

2

Off-Topic Discussion / Re: ir0ck

« on: 22 May 2018, 11:07:07 AM »

Luis the helpful thank you for a possible fix,but I can see both fine at school however something was missing. Something important

3

General Discussion / Re: Village Craft Economy

« on: 18 May 2018, 12:25:20 PM »

I have the opposite opinion I think a big change will help bring in new people and make it more welcoming to older players returning. I know I would play more with a newer economy, as the old one never got me interested (shown by I never really made my own money). I am not saying we remove the older players wealth but changing how we use it and make it could be fun for new and old players.

The player base of Minecraft is shrinking everyday, we can't really do anything to bring in new players at this point.

You say the community of Minecraft is dying and I would like to agree but the numbers right now look like they are doing just fine. This is also a very negative standpoint that seems to show you have abandoned the idea VillageCraft could ever do better than it has been doing. Minecraft is still selling very well(granted across all platforms but still), but thats not the numbers I am worried about. An article I found says the active monthly player count is just shy of 75 million so it couldn't be unreasonable to attract new players.
http://www.businessinsider.com/minecraft-has-74-million-monthly-players-2018-1
Ps. Some concessions I don't know the current months active player count, I don't know if thats on all platforms or just PC, I also don't know how reputable the site is so don't try to get me there I warned you in advance.

4

General Discussion / Re: Village Craft Economy

« on: 18 May 2018, 11:04:11 AM »

We tried to introduce a stock market via the  Bitcoin plugin, and although parliament passed it, it was unpopular with many people, because they thought that vc was a building not an economics server and "only people with bitcoin experience will benefit" but hey, whatever.

I think that it is good that we have thought this over before and change has at least been put forward, but now is not time to villanize the opposition. I do however think they are wrong on what kind of server VillageCraft is sure it is a building server (hell it's minecraft 80% of the game is building) but I could just build on a single player game. I think VillageCraft can(should) offer something that can't be done in single player (The economy we have now doesn't really count in my eyes it is too bare bones). An more in depth and active economy is something we can do to set the server apart from the solo experience.
P.S. I know that the community is another thing that sets it aside from solo but you said your self that we have a max traffic of like 6 so why is that? what are we doing wrong? and how do we fix it? and the answer is not staying the same.

5

General Discussion / Re: Village Craft Economy

« on: 17 May 2018, 08:03:01 PM »

CRH I like your point a dynamic stock market could definitely shake up the baltop and I would really like to see it implemented. Jakrelia I have to agree so the changes to the server should be for the enjoyment of the active members. That being said things not changing won't do anything to benefit the server I say these are positive changes to make VillageCraft more enjoyable for us.

6

General Discussion / Re: Village Craft Economy

« on: 17 May 2018, 01:43:15 PM »

I have the opposite opinion I think a big change will help bring in new people and make it more welcoming to older players returning. I know I would play more with a newer economy, as the old one never got me interested (shown by I never really made my own money). I am not saying we remove the older players wealth but changing how we use it and make it could be fun for new and old players.

7

General Discussion / Re: Village Craft Economy

« on: 17 May 2018, 09:35:46 AM »

Taxing autofarms is a good idea. General taxes on large plots of land could a viable way to keep people invested in the making of money. i would like some feedback, lets start a discussion and see what works for us as a collective, but just note that we all will be spending more money but it is for the sake of a more interesting economy.

8

Parliament | Suggestions / Re: Register to Parliament Here! (Reply to this thread)

« on: 16 May 2018, 11:15:30 AM »

Ir0ck42

Donator

9

General Discussion / Village Craft Economy

« on: 16 May 2018, 11:11:51 AM »

It seems to me as an older member that the economy has been stagnating. The only really easy way to make money is pumpkin farms and because of that we have a lot of pumpkin barons dominating the top 10 richest. I think it is time to revitalize this economy whether it be by restarting it or pumping new ideas into it. One of the biggest problems in my eyes is that prices are always the same, this is why the pumpkins have been so popular. I think to remedy this we should have an adaptive market place (granted I don't know how we will do this but anyways) if someone is selling a lot of pumpkins have the price of pumpkins fall netting them less money, but conversely if someone bought a lot of pumpkins have the price rise (why they buy pumpkins I have no clue) or in the case of things that don't see a lot of purchases have the price slowly normalize again until sold again. This should apply to anything, and it would provide a cool new dynamic to making and spending money. One of the other big problems is that there is a lot of old money (I never had money Octo would spot me some when I needed it ).  Well it isn't really a problem I just like throwing a spark and hoping to start a fire, the issue with the old money is that it doesn't really change hands so we should add some more risk/reward systems to maybe give some incentive to use some of the (million billions? how high are we now) players have collected. Out side of the adaptive market I have no flushed out ideas but I think that the economy can only be better and more interactive if we take steps to enhance it. 

10

General Discussion / Re: 1.13 World Reset?

« on: 10 May 2018, 09:21:17 AM »

I vote yes, you guys are too attached to the monuments of the past. It is time to forge a new era and leave the old behind. You guys are shunning the prospect of a new canvas because you spent time on an older painting that is finished now. Think of it like a renaissance for the server a time for new ideas and creations, let us not stagnate but make a new world together as we did the old one.

11

Off-Topic Discussion / Re: Heard the snow outside was 2.3 inches had to go check ;)

« on: 2 May 2018, 12:27:56 PM »

Honestly that was hilarious  I would like and subscribe and even join the notification squad if I could.

12

Off-Topic Discussion / Re: My name is becoming relevant again :/

« on: 1 March 2018, 10:38:19 PM »

I understand lol I will blame myself for watching it if it is bad

13

Off-Topic Discussion / Re: Regarding TheSkippyNetwork (Important Announcement)

« on: 1 March 2018, 12:32:43 PM »

Lol I have nothing else to to do during my study hall so no

14

Off-Topic Discussion / Re: Regarding TheSkippyNetwork (Important Announcement)

« on: 1 March 2018, 12:31:04 PM »

Please use proper grammar when posting. I know you may be 10 but act like you know how to write correctly.

15

Off-Topic Discussion / Anybody play MHW

« on: 1 March 2018, 12:05:35 PM »

I have been playing a bit of MHW recently I move too slowly for the amount of content (HR 5) but hey I enjoy it if anyone wants to play on Ps4 I need friends

16

Off-Topic Discussion / Re: Breath of the Wild

« on: 1 March 2018, 11:33:05 AM »

Wrong Wrong Wrong.
It is a Zelda game 100% the problem you guys have with it is that it isn't a copy and paste of an older title (therefore not a "Zelda" game). It has all the necessary components to be a Zelda game and it is a nice fresh look at what Zelda could have been had the technology been better in the past. I hope they make more games that can deviate and still be amazing like BotW

17

Off-Topic Discussion / Re: Emma Stone vs Emma Watson

« on: 1 March 2018, 11:28:32 AM »

I like them both but Emma Watson has the more appealing face to me
They both are good though

18

Off-Topic Discussion / My name is becoming relevant again :/

« on: 1 March 2018, 11:26:03 AM »

So with the release of the Ready Player One movie it seems my names reference may come to the masses. Assuming they don't butcher the movie the character I got my name from will be in the beginning. (He was a shitty character but hey it was a great book) I would recommend seeing the movie because the source material is amazing but there is still a chance it will be bad so don't blame me if it is.

19

Off-Topic Discussion / Re: who likes catgamer4???????

« on: 2 April 2014, 12:16:33 PM »

 

20

Off-Topic Discussion / i need a nether star

« on: 11 December 2013, 07:07:21 PM »

 I really need a nether star will some one sell me one??