Not sure if that was supposed to be a roast or not @Akomine.
@Airbongus Van Winkledorf I've provided arguments that you still haven't been able to answer on your own (Big Bang coming from literally nothing, and a cake being unable to bake itself and putting that on a larger scale, which you have only been able to provide theoretical, rather than solid, comebacks for).
With your ideology, you might as well disprove the existence of pain, since there's only evidence of pain (outbursts, stimulation of receptors, etc.). There is no "physical proof" of pain, only quite blatantly obvious evidence of its effects.
You may as well disprove that love exists as well, since there's no "physical proof" of that either.
You're asking me to provide such proof, but with God.
Again, for the 32,677th time, the big bang "coming from literally nothing" argument of yours is:
a) incorrect, the big bang theory never claims that.
b) irrelevant, as disproving the big bang does not somehow prove your god exists (I'm not sure why you think it does).
Your cake argument reminds me of the watchmaker argument, only you're using a cake rather than a watch. It's a human-made object and doesn't occur naturally, which makes it a bad comparison to the universe, which we can't just bake in an oven. No, a cake can't bake itself, but a river can carve out a path through the landscape by itself without being created by anyone. We are all aware of cakes being created by humans, and in fact we have evidence of humans making cakes:
But where's the evidence of the universe being created by someone?
And for whatever it's worth: you're wrong about pain and love. There absolutely is physical proof of both of these things occurring in the brain, which is part of the study of neuroscience.
